• Joncash2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Really? You call a person literally threatening China and now sitting across the table a pacifist? You got a weird definition there buddy. I’ll take the side of the country that hasn’t been involved in a conflict for over 40 years.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, nobody in the EU is going to war with China, but its tech dominance (as the US’s) poses a challenge to how the countries organize themselves. You confuse The EU with the west, but if the US abandoned NATO, would China abandon russia? I don’t think so. So China’s backstop of russia is a direct threat to the EU, whereas the EU is not direct threat to China without going through the US.

      • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Did you not understand, that’s exactly the offer China is giving the EU in this statement. Abandon the US and we can talk about abandoning Russia.

        • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The EU can’t abandon the US first, more likely that the US would abandon the EU… damn…this is like couples’ therapy.

          • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Ok, we were talking about why China said what they said. It’s not some evil reason or an excuse to invade Taiwan. It’s simply if your going to threaten us as next, then we will support Russia. Whatever reason the EU has to not abandon the raving lunatic in USA is not China’s problem.