It doesn’t, who the hell cares if someone allowed it to break “predict whole text” into "predict part by part, and then “with rhyme, we start at the end”. Sounds like a naive (not as in “simplistic”, but as “most straightforward”) way to code this, so given the task to write an automatic poetry producer, I would start with something similar. The whole thing still stands as fancy auto-complete

I’ll bait. Let’s think:

-there are three humans who are 98% right about what they say, and where they know they might be wrong, they indicate it

• now there is an llm (fuck capitalization, I hate the ways they are shoved everywhere that much) trained on their output

• now llm is asked about the topic and computes the answer string

By definition that answer string can contain all the probably-wrong things without proper indicators (“might”, “under such and such circumstances” etc)

If you want to say 40% wrong llm means 40% wrong sources, prove me wrong

Uhm, no. I am fine with my belly full, a place to sleep and a confidence that within foreseeable future no big bad thing is looming over me or my family - with that settled, I have no need to fight.

It needs to be said that the above does not mean I am not going to out effort in things beyond that scope, but those efforts come from the desire to make the word a better place, not from some fighting

How so?

Unless your “enemy” is “anything that most people see as a source of suffering/pain/other kind of unpleasantness”, I do not see how your statement can be true. And even then it is still a dumb way to exist