• Little8Lost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    After reading the article i think you might be wrong with this one.

    From what i got now is that there are 3 layers

    First is storage which can be completly or is decentralised

    Then backend/server/application layer which can be bsky or whatever ticktok alternative gets made which is not decentralised

    and then user layer/view which depends on the application

    What i want to say is that the relay can be exchanged through something else and then entirely including moderation and all

    So pro atProto is:

    • data seems to be actually decentralised
    • applications sharing the data
    • everyone gets the data

    And pro ActivityPub is:

    • more alternatives of the same application/server
    • way better control over data (federation & defederation)
    • servers interact with each other nativly (atPr seems to let the servers only interact with data)
    • more efficient (servers can update clients, in case of at least bsky clients have to ask servers)

    pro ActivityPub? (unsure about the technical details)

    • moderation? As in shared lists
    • able to host by individuals? As in i dont need an compute intensive relay
    • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      But what about the DIDs, the things used to actually identify accounts within the ATproto ecosystem:

      But Bluesky has developed its own DID method, did:plc. Today, did:plc stands for “Public Ledger of Credentials”, however it originally stood for “Placeholder DIDs”, with the hope of replacing them with something else later. The way that did:plc works is that Bluesky hosts a web service from which one can register, retrieve, and rotate keys (and other associated DID document information). However, this ledger is centrally controlled by Bluesky.

      It’s literally not possible to have a functional PDS without registering with a Bluesky server and they maintain indefinite control over the ledger. All your data is tied to this DID, it’s how the entire protocol is designed to identify stuff, how decentralised is your data if it’s dependent on Blusky (the company) assigning you an identity?