Sl00k@programming.dev to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 hours agoGreat ATProto blog post on the reasoning behind their design architectureatproto.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up155arrow-down117
arrow-up138arrow-down1external-linkGreat ATProto blog post on the reasoning behind their design architectureatproto.comSl00k@programming.dev to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 hours agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareCondiment2085@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down3·14 hours agoWait how is it not the fediverse?
minus-squareboramalper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·12 hours agoBy “Fediverse” people usually refer to “ActivityPub”-based social networks such as Mastodon and Lemmy. People also rightfully argue that Bluesky, despite the best of intentions, is not decentralised. See How decentralized is Bluesky really? (long read).
minus-squareZaktor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·14 hours agoThe Fediverse is a specific thing. And even if it were just referring to any federated social network, it’s very questionable whether Bluesky really can have independent instances.
Wait how is it not the fediverse?
By “Fediverse” people usually refer to “ActivityPub”-based social networks such as Mastodon and Lemmy.
People also rightfully argue that Bluesky, despite the best of intentions, is not decentralised. See How decentralized is Bluesky really? (long read).
The Fediverse is a specific thing. And even if it were just referring to any federated social network, it’s very questionable whether Bluesky really can have independent instances.