I thought this was slightly funny.

Mark Zuckerberg is known these days for wearing t-shirts with Latin phrases on them, especially ones where he compares himself to Julius Caesar.

Bluesky made a shirt in the same style, but theirs says “a world without Caesars” in Latin.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah, they will use their domains, and they can sign in with Bluesky. So it is the same account to a pretty significant degree. What I’m wondering is if the Frontpage user would break if Bsky.app disappeared, or if the user could still sign in as the identity is somehow truly decentralized.

      As for domains as user names, I guess ActivityPub could achieve something by allowing users to have verified websites (mastodon style) appear as their user names. I don’t really see what would have to change on a protocol level to make this possible.

      • Sl00k@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Identity is decentralized through the protocol so they’d be fine. Bluesky at the end of the day is just app view that sits on top of the protocol so it can disappear and everything will continue operating as long as there’s a relay online.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          But on frontpage.fyi, if you want to sign up, you have to sign up through Bluesky. They direct you to bsky.app to create your account.

          I just don’t see how this is a real functional example of a portable account. Maybe it is not supposed to be - if so, is the decentralized nature of accounts demonstrated anywhere in a practical way?

          I struggle to understand things I cannot see.

          • Sl00k@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I know this convo was 2 weeks ago, but they published a great article that includes how Identify is handled that answers our questions.

            https://atproto.com/articles/atproto-ethos

            Effectively identify is as the PDS level. So if Bluesky goes down and your account were through Bluesky you’d lose your identity ?*

            If your account is held through another platform like Spark or your own self hosted PDS your identity would remain live.

            *My question that sparked from this is if Bluesky went down and you’re already logged into a second platform, when you log into that second platform does it duplicate your DID? I’m assuming not and you’d still lose it because logins are through OIDC and the keys still exist on Bluesky.

            Regardless the true path to decentralization should be everyone hosting their own identity on their own PDS w/ identity but that might be a longshot. The path to decentralization is effectively allowed but will people take advantage of it?