• katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    7 days ago

    meta: we’re stopping political ads because of the evil eu pls write them and complain

    literally everyone: another benefit to being in the eu <3

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    Under the regulations, which are set to take effect on Oct. 10, platforms will have to label political ads, disclosing who paid for them, and what campaign, referendum or legislative process they’re connected to

    Oh yeah they sound really unworkable, who could possibly expect meta to take this very basic information from their advertisers and then display it in a small text box.

    Of course not seeing the ads is even better so I don’t think anyone will complain.

  • lemmyknow@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    We’re sad to announce that, from that day forward, you will no longer be able to see political ads on Meta services like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

    (Idk how to blame the EU while trying to sound like a sane, professional corporation not throwing a hissy fit)

    • Mia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Aren’t these ads too? Someone as paid for this propaganda so it is technically ads right?

      • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Like reedit they look the other way because fake accounts generate lots of engagement. They could easily shut down such accounts and they choose not to.

  • tarknassus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    “I’m sorry to say I cannot accept any more money from disinformation groups political parties, particularly from certain regions* because another region won’t let me put your ads out there for the plebs users to be manipulated informed.”

    * - Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and other associated places.

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    They probably think this will persuade the politicians to review these rules, as they can’t reach their target audiences anymore. I hope they see the overwhelming support for this decision, but I’m not sure if I’m in a bubble. I only see positive reactions so far. There was 1 critical article in the news, but just stating facts, no opinions. I think it’s great. Less brainwashing going on during the election cycles from now on since Facebook in particular allowed for some really specific demographic targeting.

  • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Oh shit, really?

    That’s really a pity that luckily for me I’m no longer giving an absolute metric fuck about meta and any of its shit content or its servi…spywares since 10 years at least already, and also I haven’t the slightest idea of changing my plans in that regard.

    • tedd_deireadh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      7 days ago

      Exactly!

      “So, sorry <insert Super PAC here> we’d love to help you astroturf the EU elections, but those pesky laws are stopping us.”

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 days ago

        Exactly this. This messaging is for their customers, e.g. those that buy political ads, and their investors, those that want line go up regardless of how. They aren’t speaking to their users. Their users are part of the product they sell.