hackaday.com mostly.

Everything else is “big tech adds [anti-feature], shoves AI more places no one asked for”.

Not just France. Saying that in the US, too.

There’s a few services (Fediseer and the Lemmy Canvas event) that auth via Lemmy. It’s awkward, but it works.

Basically you enter your username@instnace.xyz there, and it sends a DM to your account with a code (similar to an MFA token). You then complete the login on the app with that code.

Yep. It’s for an outdoor weather node on a metal pole, so damage would be fairly minimal if it had a bad day. It’s also only charging at like 200 mAh (max) since it’s got only a small 1W solar panel hooked to the charge controller. The only other concern would be summertime temperature, but I worry about that regardless of the cell.

Yeah, and my newer powerbanks all do PowerDelivery for 5, 9, 12, and 20 V.

I’m assuming watt-hours would be universal for them all (watts are watts, as the saying goes).

I may be re-thinking my morals for things like that here soon. My legitimate career relies heavily on federal grant money, and my skills aren’t rare enough to hope France will adopt me. Maybe I’ll start a meme coin or something lol.

That’s true, but this one came from a known (local) vendor. I took it back, and they were happy to refund it. Since they were gonna toss it, I asked if I could keep it (it works well enough to power an ESP32).

I’ve thought about selling out my morals, but realized I could never live with myself.

I guess they could still lie about watt-hours, but buying anything based off of the reported mAh capacity is a crapshoot.

Ended up with a clearly fake 18650 in my collection. Weighs way less than an older 2200 mAh one but it’s label says 9900 mAh. Again, it’s an 18650.

The culprit:

I’m the Tesseract UI dev, and I just released version 4.1 today: https://dubvee.org/post/3069664

My instance has “Rule 3: No AI Slop. This is a platform for humans to interact” and it’s enforced pretty vigorously.

As far as “how”:

1. Sometimes it’s obvious. In those cases, the posts are removed and the account behind it investigated. If the account has a pattern of it, they get a one way ticket to Ban City

2. Sometimes they’re not obvious, but the account owner will slip up and admit to it in another post. Found a handful that way, and you guessed it, straight to Ban City.

3. Sometimes t’s difficult on an individual post level unless there are telltale signs. Typically have to look for patterns in different posts by the same account and account for writing styles. This is more difficult / time consuming, but I’ve caught a few this way (and let some slide that were likely AI generated but not close enough to the threshold to ban).

4. I hate the consumer AI crap (it has its place, but in every consumer product is not one of them), but sometimes if I’m desperate, I’ll try to get one of them to generate a similar post as one I’m evaluating. If it comes back very close, I’ll assume the post I’m evaluating was AI-generated and remove it while looking at other content by that user, changing their account status to Nina Ban Horn if appropriate.

5. If an account has a high frequency of posts that seems unorganic, the Eye of Sauron will be upon them.

6. User reports are extremely helpful as well

7. I’ve even banned accounts that post legit news articles but use AI to summarize the article in the post body; that violates rule 3 (no AI slop) and Rule 6 (misinformation) since AI has no place near the news.

If you haven’t noticed, this process is quite tedious and absolutely cannot scale under a small team. My suggestion: if something seems AI generated, do the legwork yourself (as described above) and report them; be as descriptive in the report as possible to save the mod/admin quite a bit of work.

It’s been a long-running thing for blogspam to appear here. Usually admins will step in at some point and squash the accounts, but any time I see anything.blogspot.com as a post URL, I look at the account history and see if that’s all they’re posting. 9.9 times out of 10, that’s all they’re posting, and I ban them with content removal. Same for other sites that pop up out of nowhere that get spread from a brand new account.

I have no idea what the objective is (SEO, ad views, etc), but it’s been a thing as long as I’ve been on Lemmy.

Thanks for the list: some of those I had yet to ban.

You did it “undecideds” and “both sides” people: You saved Palestine! /s