

I think the cyber security prof might be different.
I think the cyber security prof might be different.
You’re a fucking joke if you think the last two months is representative of the US over the past 75 years.
A couple issues.
The Signal chat didn’t show that anyone wanted Europe dead. Agree or not, it showed that the administration wants Europe to be responsible for their own military interests (As though the US received nothing from being the security for the West over the past 75 years.)
If they want to see Europe destroyed, those receipts have to come from elsewhere.
Secondly, helping Ukraine is in everyone’s interest except for Trump and the GOP. Stopping the stupid fucking tariffs is in America’s interests. Trump succumbing to his age is in America’s interests.
Don’t confuse America’s interests with those of the people who want to destroy and weaken America. Other than that, the point is correct. Europe needs to be much more active in Ukraine, even if the US administration may object.
I wouldn’t put it as terribly anti-Europe. They’re right in that we’ve provided security for Europe since WW2.
To think we got nothing out of that arrangement is a solid chunk of dumb.
It’s one of those few things where I can see the grain of truth, but you know they’re going to execute as though they’re watering our crops with Brawndo.
Tariffs can also be good. When used wisely and in moderation. Tariffs on the heavily subsidized Chinese green energy market makes sense. Tariffs to reduce reliance on cheap Chinese manufacturing makes sense. Blanket 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada do not.
On the bright side, you don’t have to wait to shit on him. His diaper is soiled more than half of the time already. POOTUS.