Cripple. History Major. Irritable and in constant pain. Vaguely Left-Wing.
only in Africa (see the answer in AskHistorians)
While my answer was related to Africa, as that’s where I’m most familiar with a paucity of study and an excess of material, I’d bet even money that there are plenty of other non-European (and outside of the Americas) collections that have yet to be fully catalogued, especially in the Islamic World and India. I just couldn’t swear to it or name any regions in particular to look into.
In the UK? I’m in the US. I’m stuck here.
Not sure about the wisdom of making the move to the US in current circumstances, but the Green Card Lotto is where many start.
They’re right to do so.
I’m not calling them fat, I’m just saying I’m a waif who wavers in the wind, I swear 😭 I’m very liftable, lightweight cargo
Not only that, I only support universal healthcare to break the death-grip of the Danish Menace™ on our sugary-snack-gorged throats!
fuck, how did I miss that
Damn, I was hoping that theft was still okay, just not purchase 😔
No worries, I’m of the rare species of Thin American. I weigh less than, statistically speaking, the average Danish woman.
I voted against this. I’m still thrilled to hear it.
Look, I’m not saying it would be right.
But if some Danish Viking girls want to sail upriver, plunder and burn my city, and carry me off as American war booty, given how this fucking country is going, I won’t object.
Merit is generally the superior of the two. Seniority should only really be preferred if:
The performance of the task at hand is more dependent on pre-established connections and the like - ie a very knowledgeable and charismatic but new diplomat might actually be a worse choice for a given job than a rather boring and mid-tier diplomat who nonetheless has a lot of long-standing relationships in the area.
There is an issue of systemic rules in an institution where merit is not always the top concern, or not easily and clearly discerned - such as legislative committee appointments. “The best person is the most qualified for the top job” is a nice thought, but raises questions of “How do you figure out who is the best person?” and “The people didn’t send the best person, they sent this fellow to represent their interests.”
Will the political will to start an actual shooting war with the US be there?
Theoretically yes. This is an issue that has been considered before, though admittedly not with regards to fucking Greenland. Turkiye and Greece have long been enemies as well as members of NATO, and it’s been considered that the invocation of Article 5 by the aggressed-upon party against the aggressing party in case of a serious war would, theoretically, be binding on the other members of NATO.
In practice, NATO is a gentleman’s agreement with no means of enforcement. Everything comes down to political will - NATO is just an organizational structure to facilitate a response. It cannot replace the will (or lack thereof) of national governments.
Fucking bootlickers.
Stress helped me lose 20 pounds in three months last year ^.^
I wouldn’t recommend it.
Inshallah!