You can’t really measure morality like that. It’s like I look through a library and decide that the library has more sci-fi books than they did earlier because I walked to the sci-fi section. Our modern view of morality is in-line with modern morality. People 200 years ago would have considered themselves just as moral as we consider ourself now.

Unless you are by far the oldest person on Earth, these were disproven far before you were born

Eugenics is the action of preventing it. Saying someone shouldn’t isn’t advocating for its forceful eugenics.

They chose to drink and then drive. Even if I buy that alcoholics should be allowed to be alcoholics, just purchasing the alcohol, then driving home and then drinking it is of course an option.

Not just factory meat. If you are paying for another fellow creature to be tortured and murdered you are acting in an unjustifiable manner.

I mean I hardly think enforcement is the issue here. Just mandating abortions would be a pretty simple and effective method of enforcement but there are obviously other issues, I just don’t think enforcing it is the difficult part

You can’t affect any progress if you are willingly wrong