Good to know. My old one was a Redmi Note 8 Pro and I miss the excellent camera (optical zoom!)

I think one of the ways they save money is using cheap wiring, so it gets hotter than it should. Also, no waterproofing - which is why I no longer have my Xiaomi.

My previous phone was a Xiaomi and I never managed to unlock it. It would fail to unlock and then there would be a random amount of time before you could try it again. After weeks of that I didn’t want to have to set everything up again and just worked at removing all the telemetry and spying.

What makes you think they’re complaining about the new legislation?

The post contains a criticism, then says “however” followed by a positive. You’ve completely misunderstood it, from what I can tell.

Mentioning Trump in the headline feels a bit clickbaity.

wHAT WOULD rANDALL DO?

The caps lock makes sense! A key logger will get confused when you type your passwords in.

I think it will be, thank you very much.

It looks like @koraro@lemmy.world isn’t around any more, so I guess it’s unmoderated around here (aside from the LW admins).

Can’t the/a bot post here where everyone’s already subbed? If you give me a bit of time, I could get one written.

I’m not understanding why that’s an appropriate name, but maybe I need to learn more about butterflies.

This is a great example - it kinda makes sense if you skim read it but butterflies have nothing to do with butter, just like hotdogs have nothing to do with dogs.

FiveSixElevenSeventeen downvotes and counting…

LLMs are already being used for policy making, business decisions, software creation and the like. The issue is bigger than summarisers, and “hallucinations” are a real problem when they lead to real decisions and real consequences.

If you can’t imagine why this is bad, maybe read some Kafka or watch some Black Mirror.

My friends would probably say something like “I’ve never heard that one, but I guess it means something like …”

The problem is, these LLMs don’t give any indication when they’re making stuff up versus when repeating an incontrovertible truth. Lots of people don’t understand the limitations of things like Google’s AI summary* so they will trust these false answers. Harmless here, but often not.

* I’m not counting the little disclaimer because we’ve been taught to ignore smallprint from being faced with so much of it

I found that trying “some-nonsense-phrase meaning” won’t always trigger the idiom interpretation, but you can often change it to something more saying-like.

I also found that trying in incognito mode had better results, so perhaps it’s also affected by your settings. Maybe it’s regional as well, or based on your search result. And, as AI’s non-deterministic, you can’t expect it to always work.

He’s mixed up the first two diagrams - Pluto should be coloured in for the first and not for the second.