Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 9 days agoWhat is a movie that "looks like" it would suck, but actually is well written and acted and a good time?message-squaremessage-square270fedilinkarrow-up1310arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1307arrow-down1message-squareWhat is a movie that "looks like" it would suck, but actually is well written and acted and a good time?Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 9 days agomessage-square270fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejflorez@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down3·edit-29 days agoStar Trek First Contact My proof reading has failed me yet again (original fuck up: Star Trek First Conact)
minus-squareDominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up20·9 days agoI disagree. This both looked and was awesome.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·9 days agoExactly. It was one of my top three ST movies, and by all accounts. Ebert reviewed it positively, as one of the best of the franchise. I wonder why they put it in the “looks like it’d suck” category?
minus-squareDominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoHaters gonna find a way to hate? 🤷♂️
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 days agoWell, by including it they imply they liked it, so I’m guessing not a hater. Just curious why they said it “looked like it would be bad”.
minus-squareDominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 days agoI was assuming they were knee-jerk reacting like “It’s Star Trek, so it must be terrible,” and then found out otherwise. I could be wrong though.
minus-squarejflorez@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 days agoAs a Trekkie it looked awesome to me but to my civilian friends it looked like made for TV garbage, then they saw it and loved it
minus-squareMelatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-29 days agoI think people are missing that this movie is spelled differently than “Star Trek First Contact”. Star Trek First CONACT was a cheap, B-movie knock-off straight to DVD movie that should have sucked, but didnt. Angela Lansbury was not nominated for an Oscar for her preformance as the Captain, but Brooke Shields notably was also in the movie as an alien. /s
minus-squareIdeonek@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 days agoWait, what are you saying. There is.a.dooferent movie named “first conact”? (Google didn’t help me)
Star Trek First Contact
My proof reading has failed me yet again (original fuck up: Star Trek First Conact)
I disagree. This both looked and was awesome.
Exactly. It was one of my top three ST movies, and by all accounts. Ebert reviewed it positively, as one of the best of the franchise.
I wonder why they put it in the “looks like it’d suck” category?
Haters gonna find a way to hate? 🤷♂️
Well, by including it they imply they liked it, so I’m guessing not a hater. Just curious why they said it “looked like it would be bad”.
I was assuming they were knee-jerk reacting like “It’s Star Trek, so it must be terrible,” and then found out otherwise. I could be wrong though.
As a Trekkie it looked awesome to me but to my civilian friends it looked like made for TV garbage, then they saw it and loved it
I think people are missing that this movie is spelled differently than “Star Trek First Contact”.
Star Trek First CONACT was a cheap, B-movie knock-off straight to DVD movie that should have sucked, but didnt.
Angela Lansbury was not nominated for an Oscar for her preformance as the Captain, but Brooke Shields notably was also in the movie as an alien.
/s
Wait, what are you saying. There is.a.dooferent movie named “first conact”? (Google didn’t help me)