A 2025 Tesla Model 3 in Full-Self Driving mode drives off of a rural road, clips a tree, loses a tire, flips over, and comes to rest on its roof. Luckily, the driver is alive and well, able to post about it on social media.
I just don’t see how this technology could possibly be ready to power an autonomous taxi service by the end of next week.
There have been other similar cases lately, which clearly indicate problems with the car.
The driver has put up the footage from all the cameras of the car, so he has done what he can to provide evidence.
https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaFSD/comments/1ksa79y/1328_fsd_accident/
It’s very clear from the comments, that some have personally experienced similar things, and others have seen reporting of it.
This is not an isolated incident. It’s just has better footage than most.
Also this happened in February. He never reached out to Tesla? He never requested the data to show that FSD was engaged? In that thread he says he only just did it. There’s also an official Tesla software program you can use to get the full logs, but as expected he hasn’t done that.
Dudes lying for sure.
You are so full of shit, I just checked it out:
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1kskfqd/comment/mtmbkvm/?context=3
He never claimed it was recent.
Every claim you make you never provide sources, because you are probably just parroting hearsay.
Did you not even read my post? Literally THE FIRST SENTENCE OF MY POST IS THIS:
The part of mine that you misunderstood as me saying it was recent was, I assume, this:
Again, you misread and misunderstood - a common theme with you apparently - me saying that he only just requested the data from Tesla as me saying “he only just crashed the car”. The quote you posted of the guy literally confirms what I said - that the crash was in February and that he only just requested the data lol
Care to apologize?
February explains why he wasn’t on 13.2.9.
Why would he reach out to Tesla? That’s not his job, but the insurance.
But there is no point, because Tesla never takes responsibility in these cases.
It also means that he couldn’t have been on version 13.2.8 which he claims he was on though.
https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaFSD/comments/1ksa79y/1328_fsd_accident/mtlj5ki/
My point in saying he didn’t reach out to tesla is that if I owned a car that drove itself off the road into a tree, I’d reach out to tesla and ask them to investigate and see what they’ll do for me for almost killing me. Insurance is a completely different story, they’ll go and do their thing regardless.
Just no footage from the interior camera, no proof of FSD being used.
Others have pointed out critical holes in his story - namely that he claims that he was on a version of FSD that was not released at the time of his crash.
The link I gave you is the place he posted this. And you can see what version he says he was using:
https://www.notateslaapp.com/fsd-beta/
So you are parroting bullshit, the current version is 13.2.9.
Funny how people in the thread I linked to you, who drive Tesla themselves don’t question this?
Some people believe the FSD saw the shadow of the pole as a curb in the road, or maybe even the base of a wall. And that’s why the FSD decided to “evade”.
There are plenty examples in the comments from people who drive Tesla themselves, about how it steers into oncoming traffic, one describes how his followed black skid marks in the road wearing wildly left to right, another describes how his made an evasive maneuver because of a patch in the road. It just goes on and on with how faulty FSD is.
IDK what Tesla cars have what cameras. But I’ve seen plenty reporting on Tesla FSD, and none of it is good.
So why do you believe it’s more likely to be human error? When if it was a human not paying attention, it would be much more likely to weer slowly. rather than making an abrupt idiotic maneuver?
To me it seems you are the one who lacks evidence in your claims.
And problem with Tesla logging is that it’s a proprietary system that only Tesla has access to, that system needs to be open for everybody to examine.
What he says is what’s questionable though, because he says he was on 13.2.8 but that wasn’t available to the public at the time of his crash. Being on the beta channel means nothing, he still wouldn’t have gotten it because it wasn’t available on the beta channel on that day.
https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaFSD/comments/1ksa79y/1328_fsd_accident/mtlj5ki/
How am I parroting bullshit? The current version is 13.2.9? Great - has nothing to do with what I said.
Also if you haven’t realized, hating on anything tesla/musk related is the cool thing to do at the moment, especially people on left-leaning sites like Reddit and Lemmy.
Cool, doesn’t mean they’re right. The FSD saw shadows of poles and trees and power lines all the way up to that second too. Well it would have if it was engaged.
My claim is that it wasn’t using FSD because he has provided ZERO evidence that he WAS using FSD. I’m the one asking for evidence to support the claim, and he has provided NONE. Remember - I’m not the one making the initial claim. I’m the one asking for evidence to support the claim.
Even if I was the one that needed to provide evidence, I have done so - lied about the version. No interior footage to prove it wasn’t driver error. Didn’t reach out to tesla about their car trying to kill him.
Tesla have a program you can download to review your logs supposedly.