• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    We’ve been needing to rework education for years now anyway. At least this will force the teachers to change & adapt, whether they like it or not.

    • multifariace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Teachers are generally quite adaptable. We have asjustes for AI in our classrooms. We have adjuated to not teaching up to standards because we would be fined by our states for pushing some imaginary agenda. We have changed our entire curriculum the week before classes start because the County curriculum specialist had a bright idea.

      The reality is that we have to navigate arbitrary law, we have to not do what’s best for our classroom and teaching style because someone who hardly spent any time in a classroom thinks they know better. We have to do all this while being blamed for the behavior of students when their parents block the school phone numbers.

    • DrollerCoaster@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The key concern with reforming social programs like public education is that they are ongoing concerns with impacts that extend decades into the future. “Creative destruction” in public education is liable to cause far more harm than good if the transition is not handled with knowledge and care.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I think doing nothing, while this emerging tech obliterates the functioning of existing methods, is much more dangerous.

        • DrollerCoaster@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          My point is that doing “something” haphazardly is just as dangerous, if not more so, than doing nothing.