Summary

A new Innofact poll shows 55% of Germans support returning to nuclear power, a divisive issue influencing coalition talks between the CDU/CSU and SPD.

While 36% oppose the shift, support is strongest among men and in southern and eastern Germany.

About 22% favor restarting recently closed reactors; 32% support building new ones.

Despite nuclear support, 57% still back investment in renewables. The CDU/CSU is exploring feasibility, but the SPD and Greens remain firmly against reversing the nuclear phase-out, citing stability and past policy shifts.

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Rising water will leach into your drinking water table.

    Using hinkley points C 60 billion Euro as reference, replacing Germanys remaining 74 GW of fossil fuels will cost more like 1200 billion euros.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If you are burying the waste, you’d be using a mine that is below the impermeable bedrock layer. There would be no leeching at all.

      And using the most expensive project on the planet as your reference is disingenuous as best. Most other projects cost less than a third of that.

      Additionally, almost no one is ever suggesting that nuclear is a 100% replacement. Most people suggest nuclear baseload with renewables+battery for peaks.

      • Thadrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Most people suggest nuclear baseload with renewables+battery for peaks.

        Except baseload doesn’t really exist anymore in a power grid with lots of renewables. Those renewables already produce 100% of what is required at times and those times will become more common, and small gaps can be bridged with batteries etc. The real gap with renewables is going to be those times when there is no sun and wind for days, which apparently happens only a few times a year for a week or so at a time. And building a bunch of hugely expensive power plants and then have them sit idle for 95% of the time isn’t a good plan.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah. The impermeable bedrock that is readily available in Germany. That is why they are searching for a suitable and politically enforceable place since more than 50 years…