• piefood@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Which I also find understandable. I disagree with non-voters, but if both choices are terrible, and fight against what you want, I understand why people wouldn’t want to vote.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The proper way to communicate an opinion that “both choices are terrible” is to make your way to the polling station and either vote for something other than those two bad choices, or to decline or spoil your ballot.

      Not voting says “I can’t be bothered to make the effort; anything is fine”.

      People think it means “Give me something other than these two”, but it takes more effort to communicate that message.

      Political activism requires effort, and it requires effort the right way. Not voting is political inaction.

      • piefood@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I mostly agree with you, which is why I voted 3rd party, and I still recommend that others vote. But voting can take a lot of time and effort, which most people are short on. I think a lot of people would vote, if they thought their vote counted, but with the two major parties we have, it clearly doesn’t.

        I see it as less of “I can’t be bothered to make the effort; anything is fine”, and more of “Both of you fight against what I want, why would I bother”

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I understand why some people kill their families and then kill themselves.

      I’ll still put forth that it’s bad, destructive, and wrong.