• TotallyNotSpez@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Harry Potter back when I was a child and the first book was released. After reading a few pages I was already fed up with that horsecrap and continued reading The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy.

    • moopet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I read this when I was in my mid 20s, so I wasn’t the target audience. It might have been nostalgia, but I compared it against similar things I’d read as a child and it came out poorly. Derivative and twee. I understand that as the series went on it got less twee but I didn’t bother reading any more.

      I will say that at the time when it got really popular I thought it was great that so many kids were getting into reading books, so for that it deserves some credit, I guess.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly I read it when I was a preteen-teen so right in the intended age range and I liked it quite a bit, not my favorite by any means but it was good. Not going to reread it now for obvious reasons, at least not legally.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      The Harry Potter books don’t start getting good until he finally ditches the Dursleys full time. I think starting with the 3rd book?

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The first two books are definitely geared towards kids/preteens. I was obsessed with the first book when I was young, getting an owl and being whisked off to fairytale land, so much fun. By the time the series is rounding out azkaban going into goblet of fire, it begins to present more mature and relatable themes that resonated more re-reading as a late teen.