• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You keep using “debunk” incorrectly.

    You have been proven ignorant about your bible and incorrect about your god. This does not mean you have “debunked” anything,

    It is not misandry because those men were not being attacked specifically because they were men; it is misogyny for Lot to claim ownership over his daughters and offer them to be raped specifically because he values them less as women.

    jesus endorses slavery in his own words in multiple passages.

    jesus endorses incest in his own words in multiple passages.

    jesus endorses misogyny in his own words in multiple passages.

    Those are written, verifiable passages supplied above for your reference. You are ignorant of you own book, but those passages exist.

    jesus endorses misogyny, incest and slavery in the christian bible and so does anyone who endorses that novel.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      “supplied above” when you haven’t even supplied them

      specifically because he values them less

      I think that’s because they weren’t angels literally sent from God, not because they were women 🙄 either that or he was exposing the sodomites for not being interested in women, but instead being interested in men

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can play pretend, but you’ve directly responded to the biblical passages I’ve supplied in previous comments, so it’s foolish of you to make believe.

        lot valued women so low as to offer for his own daughters to be raped. You empathize with this bigotry, but your empathy for bigotry doesn’t make christian misogyny, slavery, incest, hoarding wealth or pedophilia okay.