• ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think it’s highly optimistic to expect that, if anything it’s going to be more like the collapse of the Soviet empire, with weird successor state nonsense, some civil war, guns and violent crime everywhere, and those already in power going on a free for all kill each other and loot everything spree.

    • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s going to be a Rwandan style civil war. Your MAGA neighbor will kick in your door and shoot you and your wife in the face when told to do so by Fox.

    • straightjorkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean to say, for most Americans who are not news aware, the first signs will be that they simply can’t get their treats anymore.

      Even then, many of the more rural Americans will only ever have that experience. There’s not going to be guns and tanks rolling through Westboro, Wisconsin.

      • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think you are underestimating the level of chaos and violence we are headed for. This is going to be much worse than Rome. We will be the barbarians at our own gates.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think that at all. Living in the 4th or 5th century is not at all apologies to the 21st.

        People will notice everything being more expensive. Facebook memes will tell them why that is so.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        As one of those more rural Americans-- we’ve always lived that life of not being able to get those things the rest of you take for granted. Whether it’s tofu, cell phone service, or healthcare. So my life will continue with little disruption.

        • tamman2000@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I live in the most rural congressional district East of the Mississippi. I’m posting from my Wi-Fi that runs off a 5g while I’m laying in bed in my off grid house that’s half a mile from the nearest neighbor.

          My fridge is full of tofu.

          Even Walmart has tofu now.

          Quit lying to people about what it’s like here.

          • bluewing@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Good for you. Where I live, there is still no cell service, (got to be in a town for that), and the US Postal Service will not deliver mail to my home, (I need to pay $165 a year to get a postal box in town to get my mail and I need to drive to get it). I do have internet most of the time, but that and the electricity can be sketchy in a storm, the hazards of living in a forest. So if I can’t access that, Oh well, been there before. And I have lived many years without it. Like I said, we will just do without. Oh, and the nearest Walmart is in another country, Canada. I need an enhanced driver’s license or passport to shop there. So I ain’t missing much there either. The nearest hospital, (level 3, the “barely a hospital” level) is 50 miles away and the nearest ambulance is 20 miles away-- you have a heart attack, you will probably die before help gets there.

            There is wannabe rural like you and then there is rural.

            • tamman2000@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Good for you.

              The fact that I’m in a district that is among the most rural in the US and I’m still a “wannabe” tells me that there aren’t many places left like where you are in the country. Don’t act like you have any significant numbers when you describe people who live like you. You’re not representative.

              Either that or your exaggerating. Which I’ve noticed people around me doing a lot. Hell, you might not live that far away based on what you described. You talk about where you live like my neighbors do.

              • bluewing@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                The numbers are still non-zero across the northern US. Needing a passport to shop at Walmart should be at least a hint that I’m over 1000 miles away from you. And I should probably be happy that I’m not as representative as you I suppose. In any case, enjoy your “rural” life.

                Me, I’mma waiting for iceout on the lake and for the frost danger to go away, (about another 4 weeks), so I can get my garden in again.

                • tamman2000@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  I live less than 75 miles from Canada, and my local lake is mostly melted, but I still have a lot of snow on the ground in the woods around my house, so my seedlings won’t be going out until late May either.

                  Please keep telling me about my life though.

                  Should I call you a gatekeeping asshole, or my neighbor, bub?

                  • bluewing@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    First you live in rural Mississippi, now you live less than 75 miles from the Canadian border? Should I call you an asshole ignorant troll?

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The problem is that existing power structures will try to transfer their power to the new system, and it isn’t that hard for them to do that. A new anarchist communistic structure will have to fight the CIA and the US military’s various fragments, if it goes as it did in the Warsaw Pact.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Those holding the Power Of Money will keep on using it as long as it has value to make sure they are alright (and screw the rest) hence they’ll keep on propping-up and buying out whomever controls Force and when those lose that control they’ll directly prop-up and buy out the yielders of Force.

          Sure, they would’ve preferred it for the many to pay the full costs of formal yielders of Force whose main jobs is protect the holders of the Power Of Money and their assets from the rest - the way the system still works right now - but they can easilly afford to pay the yielders of Force directly if they have to.

          Further, even if Money loses its value and hence its power, they’ll fall back to using what’s produced by the Assets they own (for example, food produced in fertile land) to pay the yielders of Force: in a total societal collapse (which, frankly, is unlikely) you can bet that the moneyed classes will use whatever power their money has left to either flee to places were society is not collapsing or setting themselves up as the Warlords of the subsequent age.

          Anyways, the point anchoring my free thinking about this is that they’ll try to keep the very same ownership, dependency and control loops going, just at smaller and smaller sizes (i.e. instead of the society-wide “people have no option that directly or indirectly work for the owners of everything to pay for the place they live in and the food they eat who cost what they cost because just a few own everything” you’ll have a smaller sized version of it with a landowner whose land produces food and who uses that food and living areas in that land to pay a couple of armed people to stop the rest from taking the land and the food, so a smaller version of the societal loop we have now were the very people being exploited by money are the ones indirectly giving money the power to exploit them).

        • rayyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Perhaps we will see a more localized anarchist sub-system purely out of necessity.

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        White power movments are literally waiting for this moment. The outliers are the accelerationists but there far far more that have been preparing for generations to exploit the power vacuum.

        A local anarchist group is no match for an well armed generation based organization.

        • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Why wouldn’t the anarchists be well armed too, especially if that’s an obvious necessity for your commune to survive? The only people in the US who refuse to touch a gun, even if their lives depend on it, are the centrist liberals.

        • Num10ck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          and the marines are standing ready to uphold the constitution if it gets that bad.

          • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Lol no they’re not. Trump seized power in a legal coup. They support the constitution and the constitution says Trump is POTUS. Short of a military coup, they will continue to do his bidding and be formed by Goebbels’s propaganda.

        • blakenong@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, anyone trying to create an anarchist/communist utopian community will be quickly swallowed up be the Proud Boys who raid them for their food and guzzoline.