I came from Reddit where they definitely did matter. They don’t seem to hold any real weight here. Is this true for some or all instances? If they don’t matter, what are they for?

  • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m disappointed by the lack of Whose Line Is It Anyway references in this thread :(

    “everything’s made up and the points don’t matter”

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes they are used to sort comments and that’s great. You also know if you’re getting into a circlejerk or a controversial discussion.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I treat them differently than on Reddit. I upvote content that I want other people to see.

    Bc there are different ways to sort your feed, I want to highlight content that adds value to whoever else’s might log on later, even when I might not like it (news for example).

    On Reddit, upvotes/Karma were indicative of your value as a poster to that community. They are more like Facebook likes/dislikes for algorithm purposes.

    On Lemmy, I see that as the value of the post itself.

  • Andy@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The up/down vote system directs the ranking algorithm on how to order posts and comments, and it visually signals to the user the relative popularity of a comment.

    This, imo, is a wildly underappreciated mechanic for combating a lot of the harmful issues people associate with social media.

    Most people recognize that discourse on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc. is designed to divide and inflame people. the reddit-style downvote is remarkably effective at addressing this:

    It does two key things in particular:

    1. Downvoted comments are down ranked and hidden, so people are exposed to less toxic content.

    2. If people do engage with unpopular comments, the negative score influences how people engage with them. On Facebook, commenting to defend Biden’s Israel policy will get elevated and create viscous fights. On Lemmy, it will get flagged with a virtual dunce cap. You can dunk on it, but there’s no point in arguing with it: we can all see that the argument is already over. Laugh and ignore.

    Taken together, these discourage people from feeding trolls, and in doing so reduce the incentive to post something uncivil or stupid. It’s a remarkably powerful tool to address a huge problem, and I wish more people understood this.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Votes also make it very obvious when people react based on their wishful thinking — when a comment is factually true but is downvoted anyway, or vice versa. A good barometer of the sentiment in a community.

    • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yes, yes and yes. Unless it is overrun/diverted by bots & shills, which is a corruption silently allowed by reddit to serve its corporate agenda. Reddit, being proprietary and closed-source, does not disclose the specifics of its voting system, which grants it some plausible deniability in the face of accusations of bias. Lemmy and Kbin etc have the advantage of being opensource, transparent, forkable, etc. whether or not you’re in line with its creator’s political standing.

    • AsoFiafia@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Wonderful explanation! I will continue to up/down vote posts and comments as I see fit. 😊

  • Camille_Jamal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think how you see it is that on reddit, some communities require karma (points) and/or age to interact with the community. On both sites, it’s self-governing, like how most bots and trolls get downvoted to hell, and whether you should interact or take them seriously, stuff like that. I can’t say anything much about lemmy, since I’m also new to it, but it’s a way of self-governing… the algorithms also use votes to sort what gets shown at the top and bottom of a page and anywhere in between.

    I’m currently on lemmy.ml and I’m relatively new, so remember other instances may be different, and take what I say with a grain of salt, because I’m new.

    Have a great day and be kind! :D

  • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They fill the role nonverbal cues do in real life. Whenever I go back to old-style forums I miss them, because everyone ends up arguing with a few trolls/nuts that would look like they’re being taken seriously otherwise.

    • AsoFiafia@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      I like the lack of karma. Generally I’m using the up/down vote options to express my dis/approval, just like you’ve stated they’re for. Given how different things can be across instances it seems I’ll just have to relearn how I view and interact with Lemmy over Reddit.

      Aside from the much smaller user base and communities, I prefer Lemmy 100%. I’m learning to enjoy the smaller user base since it’s also lacking the huge amount of bots and trolls.

  • RotatingParts@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    I thought up/down wasn’t for approval/disapproval, but to vote if the post was worth reading. In other words, a well written, factual article about a topic you disagree with should have a good number of up votes.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not sure what you mean when you say Reddit votes matter in some way that they don’t on Lemmy.

    • OshaqHennessey@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      On Reddit, the algorithm that determines which posts appear on the main page is heavily influenced by the number of up/down votes for the post and its comments.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        On Lemmy, you get to make your own algorithm to choose which post comes first.
        So you can even go with a most-downvotes-first approach.

        It will matter depending upon what people choose.
        The usual ones on clients[1] are Hot, Top, Controversial, New and Old and the Controversial one has to do with both, upvotes and downvotes.


        1. or is it coming from the server? Yeah, it seems to be provided by the server ↩︎