Dale@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agoWith AI being what it is, how long do you think before digital media is no longer admissible in court?message-squaremessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up176arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up172arrow-down1message-squareWith AI being what it is, how long do you think before digital media is no longer admissible in court?Dale@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square48linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 hours agoWhy would the courts need to understand? That is why technical experts are called to support evidence
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-211 hours ago technical experts are called Which are then ignored usually. If courts actually listened to experts we wouldnt have climate change, governments spying on their citizens, countries supporting israels genocide, big tech privacy violations, etc.
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 hours agoBut courts don’t call on experts in these cases, they are called by the prosecution or defence to support or pick away evidence.
Why would the courts need to understand? That is why technical experts are called to support evidence
Which are then ignored usually. If courts actually listened to experts we wouldnt have climate change, governments spying on their citizens, countries supporting israels genocide, big tech privacy violations, etc.
But courts don’t call on experts in these cases, they are called by the prosecution or defence to support or pick away evidence.