Title says it all.
Just looking to see if there is a succinct term, legal or otherwise. Where a bad actor can use the letter of the law to negative and malicious effect despite the spirit or intent of the law being upended or broken.
E: like someone getting a rich man’s son who is a murderer off on a technicality. The law isn’t intended to let murderers go, but a wealthy person willing to prevent justice will exploit it to do so. A person cutting a budget or program that will result in (people going hungry, discrimination, death from lack of care or disease, whatever) knowing that this will be the result, but the law says they can change programs.
Edit: there isn’t a term. Thanks for the suggestions, though.
Loopholes could be used, but they aren’t the intent behind the use.
i see. the law itself has to be intentionally “bad” and misrepresentative of whom it should benefit.
Not even needing to be misrepresented or intentional, the law can be neutral or even be intended as a benefit. Let’s look at executive orders by the president. They were never intended to be used like they are, but now they’re used as a king’s decree bypassing congress. Or bankruptcy law, intended to allow a business or individual to get a sort of do-over financially, but instead used to kill employee pension plans or escape debt by foolish spending on luxuries.