• Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ah. It used to be just someone that would say something so inflammatory or provoking that it would force interaction or responses from the people witnessing it.

    Like an obvious joke or quote of an earworm that it creates replies. Or sometimes something rude or just wrong on purpose. Modern bad actors adopting trolling tactics is not necessarily the same thing.

    You could say trolls are like onions, they have multiple coatings.

    • peculiar_goat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      A definition I saw many years ago was something like a troll tricks you into feeling a certain way or doing a specific thing. Could be positive, mostly done for humour, but the ones we hear most about in the media or whatever are the upsetting ones.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah the best ones are just taking advantage of our empathetic neurons to initiate a conversation. The terrifying ones then use that opening to inject their own thoughts on others.

    • mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I’ve been online since usenet. I try to use the current meaning of words. I fully understand that trolling has been coopted by bad faith actors.

      Originally it was a fun little bit of sarcasm or an inside joke that became a proto meme or some copypasta to share around.

      Now it’s a path to the US presidency.