• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    According to the researchers, even though there are still about 4,700 tanks in storage, most of them will be difficult to restore due to their poor technical condition.

    This is Russia though - “poor technical condition” is “ready for service.”

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Covert Cobal has been classifying in mainly 4 categories. Abysmal is the lowest one, and are often missing such minor accessories as the turet, tracks, engines, and wheels. Not to mention having sat outdoors for upwards of 50 years. Those conditions are mostly what they’re down to. It might allow for slightly higher throughout on production to start on these rusted husks rather than from raw steel, but it’d definitely be harder and more expensive to make these usable than to build a new tank from scratch.

      https://youtube.com/@covertcabal

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Devils advocate, but given the way they’ve been building metal sheds around the prior tanks and almost completely negating the main gun, a missing turret might just be a weatherproofing issue for the Orks Russians.

        It’s not like a main gun helps you survive a mobility kill from the umpteenth TM-62 in the dirt that got replanted after the last assault failed.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah. In those photos, where there’s one or two tanks left but all the others have gone… those are immovable tanks. Couldn’t even get them to the service bay. Why else would that one tank have been left behind?