I guess I’ve always been confused by the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Physics and the fact that it’s taken seriously. Like is there any proof at all that universes outside of our own exist?

I admit that I might be dumb, but, how does one look at atoms and say “My God! There must be many worlds than just our one?”

I just never understood how Many Worlds Interpretation was valid, with my, admittedly limited understanding, it just seemed to be a wild guess no more strange than a lot things we consider too outlandish to humor.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    To be clear, the reason Many Worlds hypothesis exists in the first place is because it’s a possible solution to the calculations. It’s not that someone just came up with an idea to get out of doing real work. It’s just unfortunate when the universe puts multiple possible solutions out of reach of experimentation. But hey, there was a long time of history where virtually any belief about the composition of the moon was considered unfalsifiable.

    • Wigners_friend@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      The “solutions” are not out of reach. Just do the experiment more than once, like any statistical theory.

      The moon thing: yes because it was hard to get to, not impossible in principle. If the moon was in a parallel universe your analogy wouldn’t be irrelevant.