I did not realize this was a thing until I just switched to AZERTY which… despite being marketed as being “similar” to QWERTY, is still tripping me up

Edit: since this came up twice: I’m switching since I’m relocating to the French-speaking part of the world & I just happened to want to learn the language/culture, so yeah

  • technomad@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    I retrained myself in Dvorak many years back, and really enjoyed using it much better than QWERTY. I had to revert back to qwerty because of commercial standardizations/limitations at different workplaces, unfortunately.

    All that to say that workman layout seems even better after reading that article. I don’t really see myself making the effort to switch again, but I enjoyed reading about it. Thanks for sharing.

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Small warning about workman. It has issues with lateral movements and single finger n-grams. “ly” and “ct” being notable examples.

      A piece of advice I heard that served me well was to look mostly at post covid designs. A lot of work was done on layout optimization around that time and the results show.

      My recommendations in no particular order are:

      Colemak-DH if you want to focus on a well supported layout.

      Graphite or Engram or one of the hands down layouts are modern well optimized layouts I would consider if I was to learn something today.

      Some people like MTGAP but in my book it was designed with too much of an emphasis on minimizing key spacing without a strong enough emphasis on how human hands work.

      I personally use engram but it only works for me because I have strong pinkies. If you don’t it’s probably a bad choice.