• pwnicholson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The main issue is distance (and speed), not time. Your far less likely to be in a fatal car crash (or crash out any kind) in slow-moving city traffic jams vs driving from your rural house to your job in the next small town doing 85 mph on a 2-lane highway, which is the scenario a lot of folks in rural areas have every day

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Death rates correlate with education levels, culture, urbanization rate, car size, driving laws, speed cameras and road design.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        From the linked source, #1 is miles driven. You can keep copy/pasting the same thing in response to people hypothesizing miles driven is the biggest cause, but it won’t change the fact that you are wrong.

      • pwnicholson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Correlation is not causation. They never addressed speed or distance, which are clearly the biggest factors in the chances of fatality and the chances of having a wreck at all (respectively)

        • dustycups@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          From the video:

          I’m guessing that these are in order of correlation. I didn’t notice a source or follow up further.