• Cyberwolf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    If you think Xi Jinping is dictating what BYD does with their cars then you don’t understand the fundamentals as to why China managed to attract so much foreign investment and got to where they are now in the first place.

    • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Foreign investment was because of cheap labor and companies being subsidized by the communist government…

      BYD might make a better car than Tesla, but saying that a Chinese company isn’t “under the control of Xi Jinping”, the guy who crushed Hong Kong for having too much independence and wants to do the same with Taiwan, is laughable.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s actually a bit of a myth you know. Labour in China used to be dirt cheap 30 years ago but that’s not the case now. You need experts to build cars and they demand an appropriate salary. They probably don’t get paid as much as they would in the west but they’re not being paid pennies an hour either. However the idea that China is cheap has persisted.

        There’s a reason that Apple doesn’t make the iPhone there anymore. It was getting too expensive ie they were being asked to pay for a decent wage, and they weren’t prepared to.

      • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        48 minutes ago

        but saying that a Chinese company isn’t “under the control of Xi Jinping”, the guy who crushed Hong Kong for having too much independence and wants to do the same with Taiwan, is laughable.

        Just take that sentence at face value and consider the ridiculousness of actually believing the guy alone has that amount of crushing power.

        You’re just regurgitating unfounded US propaganda which, this being Lemmy, is very unfortunate to see.

        • iii@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          60 minutes ago

          the guy alone has that amount of crushing power.

          Nobody of right mind takes this at face value. This isn’t a pro wrestling heavyweight championship belt, with Jinping suplexing the Hong Kong protestors.

          It’s obviously as head of an autoritarian communist regime, using corona measures and a militarized police to suppress people for the extravagant act of desiring freedom from the CCP.

          • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            47 minutes ago

            But even that is incorrect.

            Yes, Xi Jinping is powerful as the Chairman of the party, but the communist party of China is not the military, and there is a fair amount of decentralization in decision making.

            Further, the guy above goes “look at how Xi is suplexing Taiwan?!?!” even though he isn’t because guess what, he doesn’t actually have the power to do so.

            Also, none of this has anything to do with the topic of EV production, which is in the hands of a private company which largely operates independently of the government, much like millions of other companies that operate in China.

            Which is why I said the dude is just spewing brainless US state propaganda and Red Herring.

            • iii@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 minutes ago

              Further, the guy above goes “look at how Xi is suplexing Taiwan?!?!”

              I think you’re the only one reading it that way. The rest of us understand that it happens within a context of an autoritarian regime.

              which is in the hands of a private company which largely operates independently of the government

              Independent untill the party decides they’re not independent. (Eg).