• treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fairly different hivemind here, I think. Still annoying at times but for different reasons. Individuals seem more likely to engage on a topic though. Maybe without instantly thinking you’re their enemy.

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It took me a bit to understand this. I was so used to expecting negativity that i thought non-negative comments were being sarcastic.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “hivemind” is such a stupid bullshit concept. the only people who use it just don’t like being disagreed with. if you use the term “hivemind” you might as well be a reddit conservative

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t think hivemind is a bullshit concept. It’s another word for gregarian behavior. The observed dominance of a single point of view, amplified by the underlying system of upvotes that brings a visibility bias to already popular points of view.

        Isn’t that what we call the hivemind ?

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Congrats on being an exception to the penulatimate part of your comment then? My point is that “hivemind” is already a thought-terminating cliche. If you’re using it while seeking in-depth conversation, what do you expect to get? Hence me saying you “might as well be” such as such – which is very different from treating you like an enemy. Seems like you gave a bit of that hostility back though! And why? Because this conversation revolves around a thought-terminating cliche like “hivemind”.