• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I mean, I kinda understand where they are coming from. I don’t agree with their implementation though.

    Why add this? Public/unsecured/shared wifi. The moment someone is on the same network, they had full access to the printer. Yeah, technically the fault of the end user, but I can understand them not wanting the potential hate for it.

    But in reality, all they needed to do was add a proper local API with full access behind a login/token system. It would suck in the short term as all previous tools would break, but it would solve both problems.