Gollum@feddit.org to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoTIL there’s a historical list of sexually active popes, including notes on whether they had childrenen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1152arrow-down11
arrow-up1151arrow-down1external-linkTIL there’s a historical list of sexually active popes, including notes on whether they had childrenen.wikipedia.orgGollum@feddit.org to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squarePunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33arrow-down9·2 days agoI’m pretty sure most of the popes were sexually active. They “had” children. Sexually. Because all religion is a scam used to control fools and children. And Catholic priests swear they will never ever have sex with women and surround themselves with boys in dresses. And they raped millions of kids. Doubtless many of them were raped themselves too. But no one rapes as many kids as the Catholic Church.
minus-squareNollij@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 day ago But no one rapes as many kids as the Catholic Church. Capitalism (esp. Reagan and Thatcher) would challenge that.
minus-squarePlutoniumAcid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoFiguratively, yes. Literally, no.
I’m pretty sure most of the popes were sexually active.
They “had” children. Sexually.
Because all religion is a scam used to control fools and children.
And Catholic priests swear they will never ever have sex with women and surround themselves with boys in dresses.
And they raped millions of kids. Doubtless many of them were raped themselves too.
But no one rapes as many kids as the Catholic Church.
Capitalism (esp. Reagan and Thatcher) would challenge that.
Figuratively, yes. Literally, no.