• phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    The price difference does make sense, it’s the cost to cover therapy for the employee that was forced to preinstall Windows on a computer for the thousandth time

  • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    nothing new. here in brazil many manufacturers, dell included, would ship laptops with linux and then people would shove a pirated windows copy on it.

        • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Fair. Although, I consider Microsoft’s market “Most laptops” since Apple kind of does its own thing and Chromebooks are ultra-low end laptops. Thus Microsoft gets ~95% of the market for themselves.

          Personally, I’d say that’s a clear case of monopoly since MS controls this entire segment of “non-Apple, non-ultra low power laptop, PCs”, but you’re right - there are other players. The thing is, they have relatively tiny niches in which they thrive and in fact pose no threat to the monopolist.

          But I now I see how you see it as an oligopoly, which is quite valid.

  • ReallyZen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Currently in France No OS is -€60 and with Fedora or Ubuntu it’s -€30

    Don’t ask. Different markets, pricing irrelevant to actual costs

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wow, I didn’t realize the windows tax was that high. I thought the bulk OEM licensing was significantly cheaper than the retail price.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Windows is free for anyone to use indefinitely… If you’re OK with a persistent watermark.

    Why even add a premium to the laptop? Let the user decide to use windows as-is, pay a license, or switch to Linux. 🤭

    • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      In practice. Technically, were M$ to go sue users left and right (or send those ISP-style “gotcha”, now pay up) emails.

      Luckiy, M$ knows well enough that 90% of that userbase wouldn’t have too many qualms jumping ship if they got slapped with a huge fine, so M$ lets them be.

      They value the high userbase more than a quick payout (and rightly so). However, there’s no guarantee that can’t change overnight (just look at Unity and before that, Adobe).